Senator Hillary Clinton says that if she she knew then (back before her vote for the Iraq War) what she knows now, she would not have voted to give the President authorization for the Iraq War.
Based on previous statements by Sen Clinton and other Democrats, I thought that they only voted to allow President Bush to threaten Saddam into cooperating with the UN. So is she saying that she now regrets that the President even threatened Saddam? Does that mean that she was perfectly fine with Saddam staying in power? Is she one of those people on the Left who believes Bush is more evil than Saddam? What else could it mean?
So I guess that as long as we know she will have perfect knowledge of the future, we can trust her judgment once she becomes President.
I'm wondering where that perfect knowledge is supposed to come from.
Joe Wilson?
Comments